Showing posts with label Sen Harry Reid. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sen Harry Reid. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Give Your Doctor a Chicken!

Chickens for   Checkups


The Senate race in Nevada is heating up. Sen. Harry Reid (D) is losing in the polls to the Republic opponent, Sue Lowden. But things might change with Lowden's latest position on health care that she is proposing.

Democrats opened a new round of gleeful attacks as Sue Lowden, the Republican front-runner to unseat Sen. Harry Reid, again extolled the virtues of "bartering" for health care.

Lowden was recently the subject of late-night humor after saying health care costs would be lowered if health consumers paid with cash and bargained down prices with health providers. She called it "bartering," a term normally referring to a trade of one good or service for another.

Lowden defended her remarks Monday on the "Nevada Newsmakers" TV show.

"You know, before we all started having health care, in the olden days our grandparents, they would bring a chicken to the doctor, they would say I’ll paint your house," she said. "I mean, that’s the old days of what people would do to get health care with your doctors. Doctors are very sympathetic people. I’m not backing down from that system."

The Reid campaign, which has for months focused its attacks on Lowden, sent out a statement with the subject line: "Has Sue Lowden Lost her Mind?"

Lowden, a wealthy casino owner, has occasionally veered off message since the campaign began. The latest slip threatens to make her appear out-of-touch, which is the very attack Republicans had hoped to use against Reid.

Still, Lowden can claim a healthy lead in polls against both Reid and Republican primary opponents.

A question: How many chickens do you bring to the doctor in exchange for a lobotomy? (let alone a quadruple bypass.)

Greg Sargent claims that the
Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee is countering with a new website, "Chickens for Checkups!"

The DSCC’s new Chickens for Checkups Web site — a name that first appeared below on this blog — will allow people to send Lowden a “personalized message asking for her help in finding a doctor for their 19th century illness,” DSCC spox Deirdre Murphy says. It will include a menu of stuff you can choose to barter for treatment.

“You can’t make this stuff up,” Murphy says. “Sue Lowden is completely out of touch with reality if she thinks trading chickens for checkups is smart health care reform.”

There’s little downside in putting up a quick and dirty Website on this kind of stuff, since it doesn’t cost much of anything. Dems want to turn Lowden’s chicken chatter into a symbol of GOP unwillingness to embrace real solutions to people’s problems.
Sue Lowden's campaign isn't backing down. They are claiming that even doctors support chickens for checkups. Lowden’s spokesperson, Chrystal Feldman, sent out this statement:

Republican Sue Lowden is the target of a new website paid for by  the DSCC.

“Americans are struggling to pay for their health care, and in order to afford coverage we must explore all options available to drive costs down. Bartering with your doctor is not a new concept. There have been numerous reports as to how negotiating with your doctor is an option and doctors have gone on the record verifying this.

“Unfortunately, Harry Reid’s failed leadership forces us to take drastic measures. The fact remains that instead of producing a health care solution Americans support, Harry Reid spends his time focusing on attacking his biggest threat to another six years in Washington, Sue Lowden.”

The Lowden campaign sends along this letter to a local paper from a local medical professional, supporting the concept. “I have bartered with patients — for alfalfa hay, a bath tub, yard work and horse shoeing in exchange for my care,” the doc wrote.

Be that as it may, there’s a larger political context here, and Lowden’s tripling down on the idea only ensures that the story keeps on going, potentially turning her into a national punch line.
Comedians are having a hay day with this story.


Thursday, October 8, 2009

Allowing a Vote on Health Reform

From Rachel Maddow:
"Two major powerbrokers on the left…are encouraging a Senate strategy in which the leadership would revoke chairmanships and other leadership positions from any Democrat who sides with a Republican filibuster to block a vote on health reform.

PETITION TO SENATE MAJORITY LEADER HARRY REID:

"Any Democratic senators who support a Republican attempt to block a vote on health care reform should be stripped of their leadership titles. Americans deserve a clean up-or-down vote on health care."

Over 12,000 people have signed -- can we break 20,000?

Click HERE to sign a petition to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in support of this idea.

Saturday, May 2, 2009

Do the Bankers Own Congress?


Legislation sponsored by Senate Majority Whip Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) recently failed to overcome a 60-vote filibuster in the Senate. This measure would have allowed bankruptcy judges "to modify troubled mortgages, lowering the interest rate or principal balance, a process known as a cramdown. Bankruptcy courts can already make those changes for a second home or investment property, but not a primary residence."
Durbin noted that estimated foreclosures during the housing crisis has ballooned from 2 million to 8 million since his campaign for the change to the bankruptcy code began. He said, "I'll be back. I'm not going to quit on this."
Supporters argued the measure would keep 1.7 million borrowers in their homes, but it ultimately foundered in the face of fierce financial industry and Republican opposition. The bankruptcy modification provision, which was offered an amendment to a broader housing bill, failed by a vote of 45 to 51.
Daily Kos is correct:
The concept by Durbin, Boxer, and Schumer was simple -- allow bankruptcy judges to change terms of peoples' mortgages so that they could make payments that they could afford.
This is a sad day for this country when we have so-called "Democrats" who cave into the Republicans as though George Bush were still in office and Tom DeLay, John Boehner, and Roy Blunt were stalking the floors of Congress bullying reluctant members to go along with the Bush administration's unconstitutional schemes.
The following so-called "Democrats" decided that they would favor the banking industry over the well-being over 2 million people whose homes are in danger of being foreclosed on:

Baucus (D-MT)
Bennet (D-CO)
Byrd (D-WV)
Carper (D-DE)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Johnson (D-SD)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Nelson (D-NE)
Pryor (D-AR)
Specter (D-PA)
Tester (D-MT)

An interesting point is that 5 of the 12 senators who voted NO [in bold] had previously joined with Evan Bayh's "conservadems." Bayh even voted YES on this bill.

Then of course Arlen Specter, who just switched to being a Democrat in name only, also voted with the Republicans.

Anyone Surprised? Maybe Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid should be.

Sen. Reid believes that the Senate will agree to bipartisan legislation without the need for reconciliation. Reconciliation would insure that major bills would pass by a simple majority vote and avoid a Republican filibuster. He specifically sees this bipartisan legislation working on the issue of health care.

As evidence that he's hoping not to rely on reconciliation, which requires just 51 votes, Reid noted that with Sen. Arlen Specter's defection to the Democratic Party this week, he would need just one Republican to cross over to get the 60 votes needed.

Sen. Reid needs to wake up to reality. The vote on the Durbin amendment was bipartisan only on the Republican side.

What about President Obama? According to Arianna Huffington, Obama needs to say 'enough' to the bankers.